My freshman comp teacher (whose
name I have mercifully forgotten) believed himself to be a deep thinker. During
class, he often dispensed wisdom about things he found witty, interesting, or
absorbing while maintaining the façade of an academic elite. On a rainy day, he
once said in a serious tone: “The thing
I hate most about rainy days is the rain leaves little brown circles on the toes
of my tennis shoes, and they won’t wash out.”
He was study in contradiction
who kept changing the rules. This
created frustration for students trying to determine exactly what their
instructor required to get a good grade.
At the beginning of the semester, he promised a term paper at the end of
semester would count for a large percentage of the final grade. This produced hope that, while he gave out
very low grades on essays, a good term paper could save us.
But then, near the semester’s
end, he suddenly had a mathematic epiphany and realized that allowing the final
term paper to count so much would negate our earlier efforts. This was exactly what we desired!
The most memorable thing about
the class, however, was a single short story.
While we were required to purchase a literature book, we read only one
story in the book. We spent long,
tortuous weeks reading and re-reading that story: The Garden of the
Forking Paths by Jorge Luis Borges.
We studied the story line by line, word by word. With mind numbing
determination, we discussed every nuance of the story, whether intended by the
author or not.
"Red," he would say.
"What deep, philosophical implications do you see in that word?"
This exhaustive examination of an
obscure short story produced in most of his students a deep desire to bang
heads against the brick walls of the class building. The teacher’s motivation for such in-depth study
of the story was lost on his students.
But the reason became clear to
me a couple of years later when I learned that this instructor had written a
thesis on The Garden of the Forking Paths by Jorge Luis Borges. So we, his students, were unwitting and
unpaid research assistants in his pursuit of a doctorate.
When I realized how the instructor
had subtly coerced students to assist in his research while pretending to
teach, I was outraged. I felt disillusioned,
cheated, even used.
He used his position for
personal gain. And the world seems to be
sadly full of people like that today. What do you think?
No comments:
Post a Comment